With the broad selection of mass flow meters on the market, comparing the options can seem difficult. Understanding what to look for when comparing meters makes it easier.
Primarily, flow meters differ in the way they measure flow. A meter either measures flow directly or indirectly, and this measurement may or may not depend on fluid properties. For example, one meter calculates mass flow indirectly using a differential pressure measurement and known gas properties, while another meter calculates mass flow directly and independently of gas properties.
There is also considerable variation between the meters when it comes to fluid compatibility, operating range, measurement specifications, and price. This article presents the basic operating principles of four common meter technologies and 10 parameters to consider when choosing the optimal flow meter for an application.
Laminar mass flow meters measure mass flow indirectly from differential pressure. These meters contain flow elements that convert turbulent flow into laminar flow. A sensor measures the pressure drop across these flow elements, and the meter uses this data along with the Poiseuille equation to calculate a volumetric flow rate.
The meter then converts this volumetric measurement to standardized mass flow with the help of preloaded tables of gas properties that take temperature and pressure into account. Although there are several variables involved, high accuracy sensors ensure accurate readings. Since the mass flow calculation is different for each gas, it is important that the correct gas is selected.
There are two primary thermal flow meter technologies, and each measures flow directly using temperature sensors. Additionally, thermal meter measurements depend on gas properties, which change with temperature, so they have gas tables loaded into them.
The first technology is the thermal bypass flow meter. It operates by directing a small portion of the fluid to flow through a capillary tube wrapped in a heated element with temperature sensors on either side. When there is no flow, there is no temperature difference between the sensors. But the incoming cool flow passes the first sensor, and the temperature drops. The flow is then heated as it passes the heating element, and it raises the temperature of the second sensor. The temperature difference between the sensors is directly proportional to the flow.
The second technology is the thermal MEMS or CMOS flow meter. It operates by maintaining a temperature differential across a heated sensor and a flow temperature sensor. When there is no flow, the differential temperature across the sensors is constant. A flow causes the flow temperature sensor to cool, and a heating current is added to compensate for the change. This current is directly proportional to the mass flow rate. The largest benefits of MEMS meters over thermal bypass meters are the speed of response and small package size.
Coriolis mass flow meters utilize the Coriolis principle to measure mass flow directly and independently of fluid properties. These meters contain one or two tubes that are electromagnetically oscillated at the tube’s resonant frequency. This oscillation is measured by sensors at different points along the length of the tube. When there is no flow, the tube oscillates symmetrically, and there is no phase difference between the points.
As flow passes through, the tube twists, inducing a phase shift between the points that is directly proportional to the fluid mass flow rate. This measurement has no pressure dependence, and the only temperature effects are mechanical or electronic, resulting in zero shifts, which are an order of magnitude smaller than other technologies.
It is important to first ensure the flow meter is compatible with the flow rates, gas choices and temperatures of the application, and these ranges for the various technologies are shown in Figure 1.
The Coriolis meter operates across the largest range of flow rates and temperatures, and it is a viable option for certain extreme high-flow, high-temperature applications. For extremely low-flow applications, the laminar and thermal bypass meters are better choices. In terms of gas compatibility, all meters work with common gases. But the Coriolis is the only meter compatible with some of the more difficult gases like NO2, which exists in equilibrium of unknown proportion with N2O4.
The next parameters to consider are operating pressure and pressure drop. Since pressure regulators and pumps are generally inexpensive, pressure control is easily adjustable in most applications. Although, there are some applications that require tight regulation of operating pressure such as chemical reactions or minimal pressure drops such as volumetric meter calibration.
Figure 2 shows that the thermal bypass and Coriolis meters have the advantage in high-pressure applications, and the Coriolis meter actually becomes incompatible in low pressure drop applications.
Higher accuracy meters cost more, and depending on meter type and flow rate, even slightly increasing accuracy can be expensive, as shown in Figure 3. For example, at the low end of flow rates, a laminar flow meter costs around $1,000, while the higher accuracy Coriolis flow meter costs around $5,000. However, at the high end of flow rates, the meters are comparably priced.
For some applications, high accuracy is not negotiable. Take for example an application where someone is working in a small-scale biopharmaceutical lab that plans to scale up for mass production and wants to minimize scaling up of inaccuracies. But in other applications, a lower accuracy meter will suffice, and this can save a lot of money.
Response times can vary significantly between meters, and improving this can also be expensive, as shown in Figure 4. The Coriolis meter has response times that vary from 1 ms to 500 ms, depending on size, processor and firmware. The larger flow tubes typically oscillate at lower frequencies and have longer response times.
Laminar meters have the best response times in the middle range of flow rates. For extremely low flows, the laminar meter takes longer to detect small changes in differential pressure due to the large size of the flow body. For larger flows, the laminar meter software performs averaging to eliminate measurement noise, and this, too, slows response time.
Now, imagine working in a fiber optic cable manufacturing plant where there are typically multiple preforms being purified and multiple fibers being drawn at a single time, all off the same pressure source. During a long run, there may be several pressure dips and spikes caused by other runs stopping and starting, and these changes in pressure can cause delays and wasted batches. Fast response times here allow for pressure changes to be corrected quickly, minimizing wasted time and resources.
The warm-up time for a device can vary from a few seconds to several minutes. For some applications, a longer warm-up time may be nothing more than a small inconvenience. But imagine a device is used to calibrate outdoor air samplers in locations that experience harsh weather. In this case, a fast warm-up time can be crucial as it means less time at each site.
Here, the thermal MEMS and laminar flow meters are strong choices as they have warm-up times in seconds rather than minutes. Furthermore, as shown in Figure 5, the MEMS is less expensive and is an ideal choice if it meets all other application needs.
The exact meaning of the turndown may vary slightly between manufacturers, but it is essentially the operational range of a meter. As shown in Figure 6, the ratio will differ depending on the device and gas choice. For example, some manufacturers may have a meter with a 10,000:1 turndown ratio for standard gases, but the anti-corrosive version may only have a turndown ratio of 100:1. If an application operates across a large range of flows or uses uncommon gases, a meter with a large turndown ratio, or even two separate meters, may be required, whichever is least expensive.
Selecting the mass flow meter that is optimal for an application can seem complicated, but knowing what parameters are important to consider and in what order makes the decision much simpler.
The choices can be narrowed significantly by first ensuring requirements for flow rate, temperature and gases are met. Then, take into account the reasonably adjustable parameters like operating pressure and pressure drop. After this, consider budget and application-specific parameters, such as accuracy, response time, warm-up time and turndown ratio.
Armed with these guidelines, choosing the right mass flow solution based on the unique requirements of a given application should prove to be much simpler.
ReferencesThis article was originally published in Process Instrumentation on January 8, 2021. Read the original article here.
You will get efficient and thoughtful service from tnma.
Sign up for our newsletter
Article | June 15, 2023.
Download as a PDF document
Water utilities rely on accurate and dependable flow measurement for critical process controls. Regulatory agencies also require flow monitoring and reporting, with specific accuracy limits.
Flow metering technology is continually improving, and a variety of meter types and styles are available. Each flow meter application is unique, and flow meter selection should not be based on “low bid.” While cost is always important, other factors carry more weight when it comes to selecting a flow meter.
Here are six important considerations for choosing the best flow meter.
Before specifying a meter, it’s important to clearly understand the entire process and where the meter fits in that process. Involve plant operators during design to discuss issues of maintenance, calibration, and access. Does flow need to be totaled? Does information need to be transmitted to a supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system or be available on the Web? Knowing who will be using the meter and specifically how it will be used is the starting point.
The media being measured is one of the most important considerations when choosing a flow meter. Conductivity, temperature, pressure, and viscosity can affect certain types of flow meters. How clean or dirty the water is may also impact the type and style of meter.
So, the next step in choosing a flow meter is to thoroughly understand the characteristics of the flow to be measured. In an existing facility, data on the matrix should be readily available for review. Standard engineering criteria can be used for new facilities if needed.
For example, propeller meters are often used in drinking water systems, especially for measuring well water withdrawal. These velocity meters can measure fluids containing a certain amount of sand, dirt, iron, and other contaminants. However, these meters would not be recommended for raw wastewater containing stringy materials and wipes, which would foul or damage the meter.
On the other hand, electromagnetic “mag” meters are very accurate when measuring conductive materials like water and wastewater. They have no moving parts to corrode or break. Different styles of mag meters are available for specific fluid measurements, including drinking water, wastewater, and sludges.
How accurate must the flow measurement be? This depends on the meter’s purpose. Flow measured to control chemical feed may need greater accuracy than that used for general tracking of water treated. Flow measurement for billing purposes, such as a water supply authority selling water to a utility, must be extremely accurate.
Regulatory conditions may also apply. Most water and wastewater systems have permit limits for maximum flows and must measure and report daily flow totals. Be sure to check all existing permits for flow measurement accuracy requirements.
Measurement range and turndown rates must be considered as well. Engineers often size equipment and pipe for a 20-year growth period, which can lead to problems when current flows are much less than design rates.
Some utilities may require meters to have NSF-61, NSF-372 approvals or ISO 9001certification. Manufacturers may also accredit their calibration laboratories through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). NVLAP provides NIST accreditation to testing and calibration laboratories using management and technical requirements of the international standard ISO/IEC 17025:2005.
Proper location and installation of flow meters are critical for providing accurate measurement. Even the most sophisticated meter will read erroneously if installed improperly. Improper installation occurs most often when trying to “force” a flow meter into an existing plant or network or make it fit in a tight site.
Most flow meters require a specific amount of straight run pipe to prevent flow disturbances. Pipe bends, valves, tees, and reducers can create significant flow measurement errors—up to 50 percent for certain meters. In a new system, straight runs can usually be designed appropriately. However, sufficient straight runs may be difficult to obtain in existing systems or constrained sites. Flow conditioners may help reduce inaccuracies. Also, some meters can measure more accurately than others under these conditions.
Pipe size, material, and direction are part of the meter selection equation. For instance, downward flow should be avoided when measuring liquid. As noted previously, systems are sometimes overdesigned to accommodate future growth. In most cases, the pipe must be full for accurate measurement.
What information needs to be monitored and recorded, and how? Some applications require continuous recording of the flow, plus total flow readings. Do operators need event notification, such as high flow or zero flow alarms? Data must often be sent to a SCADA system. In some cases, flow meters are located remotely and need battery-powered devices.
During design, determine what type of output is needed. While 4 to 20 milliamp is most common, some facilities may need MODBUS cards or other instrumentation.
Flow meter manufacturers’ representatives have a great depth of expertise. They know the right questions to ask and can recommend the best solutions for each unique installation. Use them as a trusted technical partner.
Your technical partner can help to make cost-effective decisions as well. Manufacturers can help by outlining lifecycle costs, including installation, maintenance, and calibration in addition to purchase price.
Most of all, your technical partner can help you choose the right meter up front rather than trying to make the wrong meter work after it’s installed.
If you want to learn more, please visit our website Gas Flow Measurement Instruments.